Heirs of the English kings another possbiity

Joined Aug 2015
4,706 Posts | 1,102+
Chalfont, Pennsylvania
As we all know, there are are a number of possible heirs of the English monarchs, due to various usurpations and different possible inheritance rules. Today, writing post number 16 at this discussion: Henry IV of England – Usurper or Saviour? . I thought of another possible line of heirs of the Plantagenet Dynasty.

As we all know, when someone commits treason and trys to overthrow a monarch, the results can vary drastically. If they are successful, then as Sir John Harington (1561-1612) wrote:

Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.

John Harington (writer) - Wikiquote

But I at least dare call it treason if it happened long ago and far away.

And if treason fails a traitor can be punished up to being executed, and their descendants can have their property confiscated and lose all right they might have to the throne. So as a general rule, whenever treason is successful, loyalists to the old regime can claim that the old regime is still the right regime, and that the descendants of the traitors lose all right to the throne.

in 1326-27, there was very successful treason in England, when Edward II was deposed by his wife Queen Isabella and her friend Roger Mortimer, and forced to abidcate, and Edward II and Isabella's son Edward III was made king. Some people might wonder if, or how much, Edward III was guilty of treason. He was 14 years old, and he was probably just a guest or prisoner of his mother and Mortimer. But Isabella was clearly guilty of treason, and so lost all right to the English crown she had.

And of course Isabella did have some sort of claim to the English throne. Her great great great grandfather King Philip II Augustus of France was descended from William the Conqueror and from his wife Matilda, who was descended from King Afred the Great of the Anglo-Saxons.

https://www.genealogics.org/pedigre...EO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=6

And Isabella's own ancestor chart:

https://www.genealogics.org/pedigre...EO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=8

Shows she was descended from more recent English kings. For example, she was descended from King Stephen, and from Henry I, Empress Matilda, and King Henry II. Henry II's daughter Eleanor was the mother of Blanche of Castile, mother of Louis IX of France, father of Philip III, father of Philip IV, father of Isabella. And Empress Matilda's mother Edith/Matilda of Scotland was the niece of Edgar the Aetheling, the last Anglo-Saxon King of England. If dozens of people had died suddenly Isabella could have become the heir to England in her own right.

Anyway, some people could believe that the usurpration by Isabella and Mortimer to make Edward III king of England makes Edward III and his heirs ineglible to become monarchs of England.

to be continued.L
 
Joined Aug 2015
4,706 Posts | 1,102+
Chalfont, Pennsylvania
Continued from Post # 1.

Heirs of Edward II if Edward III and his heirs are considered ineligible.

One) Edward II (1284-1327) King of England. Orerthrown by Isabella and Mortimer to put his older son Edward III on the throne.

Two) John of Eltham (1316-1336), Earl of Cornwall,second son. No Childern.

Three) Eleanor of England (1318-1355) younger sister of John. Married Reinald II, Duke of Gelre, Count of Zutphen.

Four) Reinald II, Duke of Gelre, Count of Zutphen (1333-1371), No legitimate children. Last surviving legitmate descanendant of Edward II, except for the descendants of Edward III, excluded form this discussion..

https://www.genealogics.org/descendtext.php?personID=I00000810&tree=LEO&generations=4

[Thomas of Brotherton (1300-1338), Earl of Norfolk. Younger brother of Edward II.]

Five) Margaret (c.1322-24 March 1399) Duchess of Norfolk, Countess of Norfolk. Older daughter.. Masriied first, John de segrave, 4th baron Segrave.

[Elizabeth Seagrave (1338-1368/75) Baroness Seagrave. daughter. Married John de Mowbray, 4th Baron Mowbray]

https://www.genealogics.org/descendtext.php?personID=I00003852&tree=LEO&generations=4

Six) Thomas de Mowbray (1365/66-22 September 1399) Duke of Norfolk. Son.

Seven) John de Mowbray (1392-1432) Duke of Norfolk, Second but oldest surviving son.

Eight) John de Mowbray (1415-1461) Duke of Norfolk. Son.

Nine) John de Mowbray (1444-1476) Duke of Norfolk, Son.

Ten) Anne de Mowbrary (1472-1481) Countess of Norfolk. Only child. Married Richard of Shrewsbury (1473-1483) Duke of York and Norfolk. Childless. The title of Duke of Norfolk of the first creation became extinct when John de Mowbray (1444-1476) die din 1476. It was created again in 1477 for his son-in-law Richard, Duke of York. Richard disappeared from the historical record in 1483 and was believed secretly murdered.

Anne de Mowbray died in Greenwich on 19 November 1481.[5][6] Her estates should have passed to William, Viscount Berkeley and to John, Lord Howard, the co-heirs of the last duke's great-aunts. However Edward IV was not willing to relinquish the wealthy Mowbray estates, and so in January 1483, Parliament passed an act that gave the Mowbray estates to Richard for his lifetime (and at his death to his heirs if he had any).[5] The rights of the two co-heirs at law were extinguished; Viscount Berkeley had financial difficulties and King Edward IV paid off and forgave those debts. Berkeley then renounced his claims to the Mowbray estate before parliament in 1483. Nothing was done for Lord Howard.[7][8]
Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York - Wikipedia

To be continued.
 
Joined Aug 2015
4,706 Posts | 1,102+
Chalfont, Pennsylvania
Continued from post number 2.

As said above, the dukedom of Norfolk of the first creation, Created for Thomas de Mowbray (1365/66-22 September 1399), came to an end when his great grandson the 4th Duke, John de Mowbray (1444-1476), alos Earlof nOttingham and EAarl Warenne, died without male heirs. His only child Anne de Mowbary (1472-1481) Countess of Norfolk, married Richard of Shrewsbury (1473-1483), 2nd son of Edward IV. Richard was Duke of York, and 1st Duke of Norfolk of the 2nd creation. His dukedomof Norwfok died with him. Since Anne had no children.:

"Anne de Mowbray died in Greenwich on 19 November 1481.[5][6] Her estates should have passed to William, Viscount Berkeley and to John, Lord Howard, the co-heirs of the last duke's great-aunts. However Edward IV was not willing to relinquish the wealthy Mowbray estates, and so in January 1483, Parliament passed an act that gave the Mowbray estates to Richard for his lifetime (and at his death to his heirs if he had any).[5] The rights of the two co-heirs at law were extinguished; Viscount Berkeley had financial difficulties and King Edward IV paid off and forgave those debts. Berkeley then renounced his claims to the Mowbray estate before parliament in 1483. Nothing was done for Lord Howard.[7][8]".

Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York - Wikipedia

Wiliam, Viscount Berkeley, and John, Lord Howard were descendants of the two daughters of Thomas de Mowbray (1365/66-22 September 1399) the 1st Duke of Norfolk of the 1st creation. And they would have been angered by King Edward IV giving the Mowbray estates which they should have inherited to Richard Duke of York.

When Edward, Prince of Wales, became King Edward V, all his titles merged with the crown. And when he was deposed on 25 June 1483 and Richard III became king, the titles which automatically belonged to the heir immediately when to Richard III's son. Edward IV:s younger son, Richard of Shrewsbury, was made Duke of York in 1474. In anticipation to his marriage to Anne de Mowbrary, Richard was created Earl of Nottingham, a former title of her father in 1476, and Duke of Norfolk and Earl Warrene, other titles of her father, in 1477.

The title of Earl of Nottingharm was created again in 1483 for William, Viscount Berkeley. The title of Earl of Surrey or Earl Warrene was granted in 1483 to Thomas Howard, son of John, Lord Howard, who was created 1st Duke of Norfolk of the 3rd Creation. and I can't help wonderng whether the desire of William, Viscount berkeley and John Howard to be certain to keep their new titles was a major motive for the deaths of the Princes in the Tower.

Supposing for the moment that .... Margaret de Mowbray was the older daughter of Thomas de Mowbray (1365/66-22 September 1399), 1st duke of Norfolk of he 1st creation, the line of heirs would continue.

[.... Margaret de Mowbrary (d. 1459) married Sir.Robert Howard.]

Eleven) Sir John Howard (c. 1423-1485) 1st Duke of Norfolk of the 3rd creation. Son.

Twelve) Thomas Howard (1443-1524) 2nd Duke of Norfolk. Son.

Thirteen) Thomas Howard (1473-1454) 3rd Duke of Norfolk. Son.

https://www.genealogics.org/descendtext.php?personID=I00007810&tree=LEO&display=block&generations=6

[Henry Howard (1517-1547) Earl of Surrey. Son. died before father]

Fourteen) Thomas Howard (1538-1572) 4th duke of Norfolk. grandson of 13.

Fifteen) St. Philip Howard (1557-1595), Earl of Surrey and Arundel. Son.

Sixteen) Thomas Howard (1585-1646) Earl of Surrey, Arundel, and Norfolk. Son.

Seventeen) Henry Frederick Howard (1508-1552) Earl of Surrey, Arundel, and Norfolk. Son.

Eighteen) Thomas Howard (1627-1677) 5th Duke of Norfolk. Son. Died childless.

Nineteen) Henry Howard (1628-1684) 6th Duke of Norfolk. Younger brother of 5th Duke.

Twenty) Henry Howard (1654-1701) 7th Duke of Norfolk. Son. Childless.

https://www.genealogics.org/descend...850&tree=LEO&displayoption=male&generations=4

To be continued.
 
Joined Aug 2015
4,706 Posts | 1,102+
Chalfont, Pennsylvania
Continued from post number 3.

[Lord Thomas Howard of Worksop (1657-1589) younger brother]

Twenty one) Thomas Howard (1683-1782) 8th Duke of Norfolk. Childless.

Twenty two) Thomas Howard (1686-1777), 9th Duke of Norfolk. Chilldess.

[Philip Howard (1688-1750) younger brother.]

[Winifred Howard (1726-1753) daughter. Married William Stourton (1704-1781) 16th Baron stourton]

Twenty three) Charles Philip Stourton (1752-1816) 17th Baron Stourton. Son.

Twenty four) William Joseph Stourton (1776-1846) 18th Baron Stourton. Son.

Twenty five) Charles Stourton (1802-1872) 19th Baron Stourton. Son.

Twenty six) Alfred Joseph Stourton (1829-1893) 20ih Baron Stourton. Son.

https://www.genealogics.org/descend...7964&tree=LEO&displayoption=all&generations=8

Twenty severn) Charles Botolph Joseph Stourton (1867-1936) 21st Baron stourton. Son.

Twenty eight) William Marmaduke Stourton (1895-1965) 22nd Baron stourton. Son.

Twenty nine) Charles Edward Stourton (1923-2006) 23rd Baron Stourton. Son.

Thirty) Edward William Stephen Stourton (b. 1953) 24ih Baron Stourton. Son.

Honorable James Charles Peter Stourton (b. 1953) Son and heir.

https://www.genealogics.org/descend...362&tree=LEO&displayoption=male&generations=4

For a while I expected the present Duke of Norfolk to be the heir.

The next step is to see who is the heir of Isabel Mowray (d.1452), the other and possibly older daughter of the 1st duke of Norfolk of the 1st creation.

To be continued.
 

Trending History Discussions

Top