Are we living the end of history?

Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
Then you have no idea if it's authentic or not.
Fair enough. Maybe eventually I'll try visiting China--though the coronavirus experience is likely to deter me for quite a while even after this virus will indeed pass and recede into memory. Honestly, a good idea would be for me to ask actual Chinese people on Reddit and/or somewhere else about which southern California restaurants actually contain genuine Chinese food.
 
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
I don't know that they do. They eat whales. So do the Faroese and other Scandinavians. It is Americans who eat dolphins--not intentionally, but they (the dolphins, not the Americans) get tangled up in tuna catches.
Shouldn't the prudent thing to do be to remove dolphins from these tuna catches before actually killing the products of these catches and transforming them into food, though?
 
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
Couldn't he go to eat with someone who has lived in China and be guided?
My best friend is actually a Chinese Jew. His mom is ethnically Chinese (originally from Wuhan, interestingly enough!) and his father is Jewish-American. He himself identifies as neither Chinese nor Jewish but rather as simply American, though by ancestry he's both Chinese and Jewish. :)
 
Joined Jun 2017
4,052 Posts | 2,870+
maine
Shouldn't the prudent thing to do be to remove dolphins from these tuna catches before actually killing the products of these catches and transforming them into food, though?
Of course it would be sensible--but it would cut the profit margin. And what difference would it make to a carnivore? Just another meal. IMO the "prudent" thing would be to skip the whole business.
 
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
Of course it would be sensible--but it would cut the profit margin.

Are profits everything, though? Do businessmen and large corporations have no heart? :(

And what difference would it make to a carnivore? Just another meal. IMO the "prudent" thing would be to skip the whole business.

Dolphins are more intelligent than fish, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: duncanness
Joined Jun 2017
4,052 Posts | 2,870+
maine
Are profits everything, though?
I was being sarcastic.
Dolphins are more intelligent than fish, no?
Apparently they are--but that it immaterial to the point. Both are living animals and I wouldn't eat either. Some cannibals of old ate only those people who had some virtue that the eater wished to assume. Aren't you advocating rather the opposite? That it is ok to eat less intelligent animals? ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
I was being sarcastic.

Oh. I thought that you were talking about actual corporate mentality here.

Apparently they are--but that it immaterial to the point. Both are living animals and I wouldn't eat either. Some cannibals of old ate only those people who had some virtue that the eater wished to assume. Aren't you advocating rather the opposite? That it is ok to eat less intelligent animals? ;)

I think that it's more acceptable to eat less intelligent animals than it is to eat more intelligent animals--just so long as this eating is done painlessly, of course. It's similar to why I believe that, say, human zygotes or human embryos should be given less rights than, say, human children or adult humans should.
 
Joined Apr 2010
50,502 Posts | 11,794+
Awesome
Couldn't he go to eat with someone who has lived in China and be guided?

There's one easy way to tell whether a place is authentic or not. Look at who's eating there and what language they're speaking.

If it's mostly Chinese people eating in a Chinese restaurant, it's likely to be authentic.

I've eaten in a couple of restaurants in London's Chinatown, one in the centre and one on the edge next to all the West End theatres. The first one was mostly Chinese and other Asian people, and as authentic Cantonese cuisine as you'll find anywhere. The other was mostly theatre-goers and about as authentic Chinese as hamburgers.
 
Joined Apr 2010
50,502 Posts | 11,794+
Awesome
I think that it's more acceptable to eat less intelligent animals than it is to eat more intelligent animals--just so long as this eating is done painlessly, of course. It's similar to why I believe that, say, human zygotes or human embryos should be given less rights than, say, human children or adult humans should.

Do you eat pork?
 
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
There's one easy way to tell whether a place is authentic or not. Look at who's eating there and what language they're speaking.

If it's mostly Chinese people eating in a Chinese restaurant, it's likely to be authentic.

I've eaten in a couple of restaurants in London's Chinatown, one in the centre and one on the edge next to all the West End theatres. The first one was mostly Chinese and other Asian people, and as authentic Cantonese cuisine as you'll find anywhere. The other was mostly theatre-goers and about as authentic Chinese as hamburgers.
A huge amount of the customers at Sam Woo Restaurant are either Chinese people or other Asian people based on my own observations.
 
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
There is a pretty simple test. Take two identical meals, one freshly cooked, and the other heated in a microwave. Eat them both and compare flavor and texture.
The former would certainly be better, but this doesn't necessarily mean that the latter would be bad. It's similar to living to age 115 versus living to age 100. The former would clearly be better, but the latter really wouldn't be that bad either.
 

VHS

Joined Dec 2015
9,459 Posts | 1,223+
As far as the mind can reach
It's a reasonable deduction.



No, but I always wanted to try it before the coronavirus pandemic. Chinese food in China does appear to be much more "real" based on this, though:


It's almost as if the Chinese stomach is the eighth wonder of the world! :lol: ;) I mean, Chinese literally eat almost everything--well, some Chinese, at least.

I ate silkworms, giant water beetles, ragworms, softshell turtle, donkey in Guangzhou many years ago.
They think these are relatively "commonplace.
If Vandana Shiva was correct in Staying Alive, the Indians have utilized more species of plants than Europeans and North Americans do.
 
Joined Jun 2017
4,052 Posts | 2,870+
maine
I think that it's more acceptable to eat less intelligent animals than it is to eat more intelligent animals
Once I had a little dog, Hedda, who was as sweet as you'd want and who was fiercely loyal (were I to be attacked by a wolf, I believe that Hedda would have come to my aid)--but not the brightest star in the firmament. Now I have only Maximus, who is a clever little dog who is capable of thinking a step ahead. Are you saying that it would be acceptable to eat Hedda but not Maxiumus? That stupidity is grounds for landing up on a menu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Futurist
Joined May 2014
31,535 Posts | 3,565+
SoCal
Once I had a little dog, Hedda, who was as sweet as you'd want and who was fiercely loyal (were I to be attacked by a wolf, I believe that Hedda would have come to my aid)--but not the brightest star in the firmament. Now I have only Maximus, who is a clever little dog who is capable of thinking a step ahead. Are you saying that it would be acceptable to eat Hedda but not Maxiumus? That stupidity is grounds for landing up on a menu?
I think that eating Hedda would have been slightly less objectionable than eating Maximus, Yes--though I do think that it would have been objectionable to eat both of them considering that you groomed them to be your best friend as opposed to your dinner.
 
Joined Aug 2014
10,465 Posts | 4,802+
Australia
The former would certainly be better, but this doesn't necessarily mean that the latter would be bad. It's similar to living to age 115 versus living to age 100. The former would clearly be better, but the latter really wouldn't be that bad either.
The difference is far worse than that. A better analogy is living to the age of 115 versus living to the age of 40.
 
Joined Aug 2014
10,465 Posts | 4,802+
Australia
Last edited:
As of April 16, more than 2.9 million US homeowners (5.5% of all mortgages) have entered into mortgage forbearance plans, which is to last 180 days. This means that mortgage servicers will be forced to advance $2.3 billion of principal and interest payments per month to these people. Over 180 days that amounts to an eye-watering 13.8 billion dollars. At the end of this period they will be allowed to recoup this money through "balloon" payments. This will force many mortgage holders into foreclosure. Apply for mortgage forbearance at your peril.
 

Trending History Discussions

Top