The application is wrong because it requires that descendants were assimilated. I know plenty of immigrants' offspring who are not. For example Turks in Germany.
When we don't know the details, the normal prevalence is considered, not the exception cases. Normal cases show that the overwhelming majority of immigrants over time are assimilated, especially when they come from comapratively similar cultures (such as ancient Greek and Vedic, modern day French or German, etc).
Unless you can provide eviendce, the precedence is, born to immigrants settled in a land = identity of the land. Born to settlers in India = Indian. Period.
Again I replied that haricula refers to a name of a god and the clan while Hercules refers to the glory that is related to a god (defeat). Same thing.
The name of the god is not important, as long as it derives from a god!!!
The word hari itself means something in Sanskrit, Hera means nothing in Greek. It is that what gives it precedence over Greek etymology.
It is Ira, not Hera. You don't know either modern or ancient Greek. It's better to ask than pretend to know what you ignore. Please, don't do this to yourself. Hera is the latin "way" not the Greek.... ΗΡΑΚΛΗΣ is pronounced Iraklis.
Ira or Hera or whatever. Point is, it is a noun, with no meaning established, thus most likely an import. Hari means something, therefore, its etymology takes precedence.
Krishna and Heracles descriptions do not match at all.... How can you say that they match significantly.
The task of Herakles has close resemblance to the 'feats of Krishna', both are associated with masculinity, virility and extensive feats of power and machismo.
Significant attributes that correlate
Also the Indians themselves say that Dionysius came to them. So it is exactly the opposite of your arbitrary theories.
I never denied that. What i said is, the same source you are quoting, states that Herakles was born in India to Indian settlers, thus making him Indian.
Haricula makes less sense than Iraklis.
You can bury your head in the sand as much as you wish, but it makes far more sense than Iraklis. Ira has no meaning in Greek, Hari has meaning in Sanskrit. When seen as a whole. Hari-kula means 'descendants of the theif', Irakles means 'glory to ira', when it is established that 'glory to Ira' makes no sense for the character being identified with it, who openly defies Ira and Ira has every reason to be displeased.
Since Hari means something and Ira/Hera does not, the etymology of Hari-kulas has a stronger basis (both the cognates and the whole makes sense) than Ira-kles(where one of the cognates does not mean anything).
