Jesus [pbuh] didn't really preached for a new religion, his mission was to reform Judaism. At least, that's my understanding.
I remember a story of a conversation between an Americaqn Indian and a missionary. The Indian ask, is your God in the trees, the animals, the ground and the sky? The missionary said yes. Then the Indian said what is the difference between worshiping God in his many forms separately or as one. The missionary couldn't answer.I think the biggest problem with the OP is that it supposes an ancient form of monotheism; "Allah sent his message to people throughout time."
What it does is gloss over 50,000 + years of religious practice as "distortions". However, how does it explain the progression of religious belief?
Archeological, sociological, and comparative religious studies have shown that the history of religious development can be broken down into the following broad categories of religious world views.
1. Animistic; ancestor worship, totemic worship, shamanism
2. Polytheistic; pantheon of gods, henotheism
3. Monotheism; dualism, monism
So why do we see that animism is the root religious belief for religions around the world? Traces of animistic belief can be found on all continents that humans reside. Why does the root of monotheism only show up in the Middle East?
The scholarly explanation for the progression of religious belief makes much more sense than: "God revealed truth to ancient man, everyone got it wrong for 50,000 years, then my religion got it right."
Well I can only speculate that St. Thomas Aquinas's answer to such a question would that all truth comes from the Holy Spirit, so thus while there are different forms to God(Father, Son, Holy Spirit to give one example) there's still one divine essence.I remember a story of a conversation between an Americaqn Indian and a missionary. The Indian ask, is your God in the trees, the animals, the ground and the sky? The missionary said yes. Then the Indian said what is the difference between worshiping God in his many forms separately or as one. The missionary couldn't answer.
Bah...I'l say - 0 god, many religions....
Well I can only speculate that St. Thomas Aquinas's answer to such a question would that all truth comes from the Holy Spirit, so thus while there are different forms to God(Father, Son, Holy Spirit to give one example) there's still one divine essence.
Because that's often the character of esoteric teachings, it's usually for a smaller number of people within a faith, although that doesn't negate the wider truths of the exoteric aspects of religion. Not all Orthodox Christians are called to Hesychesm, not all Muslims are called to be Sufis, not all Hindus to Yoga, etc. Mysticism is a branch of religion, not the whole of religion in of itself. Plus there are various forms of spiritual types, not just mystics.I wonder how Thomas Aquinas would respond to why only a select few individuals in the history of mankind have been able to correctly decipher the will of the "holy spirit".
Because that's often the character of esoteric teachings, it's usually for a smaller number of people within a faith, although that doesn't negate the wider truths of the exoteric aspects of religion. Not all Orthodox Christians are called to Hesychesm, not all Muslims are called to be Sufis, not all Hindus to Yoga, etc. Mysticism is a branch of religion, not the whole of religion in of itself. Plus there are various forms of spiritual types, not just mystics.
But monotheism only pops up in the middle east . . . some 40,000 + years after the development of religion.
Right, so if we view all of the religions that have existed in the existence of man as interpretations of the holy spirit, then we are forced to conclude that many interpreted:
"Hmmm. I guess that means I should worship my dead grandpa."
Another concluded;
"Alright, I guess this means my ancestor was the eagle, so I should put feathers in my hair as badges of honor in battle."
Another concluded;
"Indeed, therefore we shall sacrifice humans to ensure that the sun continues to rise."
Only a small fraction concluded;
"I guess that means there is only one."
Even a smaller fraction concluded;
"So one, well three . . . but still one."
How do we account for this?
I think I already addressed the issue of one divine essence taking numerous forms. Each religion has its own understanding of how this works, Christians call it the Holy Spirit at work, Hindus will call it Brahmin, but they all converge at key points.
In a way yes. Plenty of nuance is involved here. This is often referred to as "the transcendent unity of religions".Ah, I see now what you mean, I think. So culturally relative?
Zoroastrianism
---------------------
It is the earliest 'recorded' monotheism. Considering the period, monotheism was highly unnatural. Nature-worshipping was more in order. The true followers of the divine message must had a hard time defining Divinity without form in those days. People tend to disbelieve what is unseen, which is true even today. The later generations of believers had to come up with something symbolic to describe SomeOne Who is free of form. So, some 'genius' got the idea of 'fire'. Thus, a monotheistic belief degraded into fire-worshiping, over time.
I think I already addressed the issue of one divine essence taking numerous forms. Each religion has its own understanding of how this works, Christians call it the Holy Spirit at work, Hindus will call it Brahmin, but they all converge at key points.
As Catholic, pursuant to the truism of the Holy Trinity, God is the Alpha and the Omega, and It even became fire that descended upon the followers of Jesus when He ascended to heaven. Thus, the painting of Michelangelo, is not the concept of the Holy Father.Christians also depict the Holy Father as a bearded old man [e.g. 'Creation of Man' by Michelangelo] , much like Zeus in that pic. But I don't think Christians actually consider him to be a bearded old man, do they?
I stand corrected - I often confused those two.Brahmin refers to the top priest class individuals of the Indian caste system. Brahman is the Supreme Self. Brahman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As Catholic, pursuant to the truism of the Holy Trinity, God is the Alpha and the Omega, and It even became fire that descended upon the followers of Jesus when He ascended to heaven. Thus, the painting of Michelangelo, is not the concept of the Holy Father.
This symbol of the One God is not about a bearded man.
![]()