The map is often sketchy, for example when talking about Cyrus maps are included which are clearly of the era of Cambyses and Darius not Cyrus plus some are rather liberal in alloted territory. A lot of historical inaccuracies, or rather make-believe. You lump the Achaemenid, Parthian and Sassasian dynasty altogether, for the record the Sassanians wouldn't take kindly to that as they despised the Parthians as Hellenised outsiders, which was to an extend true, since as you know the Parthians came from the Pahlavi, a steppe people not even native to the old Persian empire. Though it's not totally unwarranted to call them all Persian, it's just tentative to take into account for one the heavy hellenised nature of the Parthians. As for the conflicts with Rome, fair enough, yet unlike the Romans the Persians never managed to sack any Roman capital (multiple times) and the nature of their victories and the wars altogether is also something special, more complex at least then the video suggests. The "first human civilisation predating..." is really the most dubious part... unlike the above I can find no reason to attach any value to it, it's utter nonsense (you must be referring to Mesopotamian culture as a whole, which is in no way just Persian, but more like Sumerian). The human rights of Cyrus are nothing compared to the modern human rights just like Greek democracy has little to do with modern parliamentary democracy if only for the name, so not saying that it in itself is incorrect, yet that your formulation is historically inaccurate. Afaik the majority of the people in both Europe and the Middle-East and the Indus valley at the time stem from the migratory Indo-Europeans, so not from Iran/Persia, we arguably all have the same roots, not the roots the video suggests though. After that it gets more nonsensical.
I liked the first part somewhat, then halfway I realised it only got more chauvinist with the minute and in all honesty a lot of half-truths in there.
