Joined Dec 2009
19,936 Posts | 25+
You really ought to check out a dictionary once in a while:No part of "just keep having your chauvinistic fun entirely on your own" was beyond my best linguistic abilities". Another clear ad hominem sentence of yours.
I see you dodge the challenge, once again. Fair enough.
The demonstation of the total lack of logic of your argumentation is definitively not any ad hominem by any standard.
(Nope, ad hominem is not synonymous of "I don't like it")
On the other hand, crying "fallacy" with no justification is a well known cheap fallacy (essentially a variety of the red herring)
And since are so eager to derail this nice thread, please be aware that your "challange" is utterly absurd, to say the least.
That's exactly why the review of Elementary Logic is so urgently needed here...
So as you can see (I hope), your "challenge" had already been answered...
And of course, at the risk of overstating the obvious ad nauseam, once a chauvinistic lier has lied once, there's no reason why he couldn't lie again any number of times; it would be incredibly naive to pretend anything different; period.
Sorry.
That said, please don't address me any more on this issue if you don't have any new relevant evidence to disciss; you know, it may be seen disturbingly close to throlling...
