hollywood world war 2 films they seem to downplay every other countrys part in the war to piont its almost none existant
300? You're going to leave all the other allies out? :|
Braveheart, I'm quite sure the Queen would've been a teenager at that time so he would've been a ..........
The Last Legion, I'm not even sure but was it in Britannia or Germania? :|
Spartacus, I learned that Carthage had a super human giant that can survive a fatal blow and continues to fight.
The Last Samurai, now I don't really want to say anything negative about this but it's just inaccurate.
War Horse, a horse would be wounded along with the rider while charging into a barrage of gun fire.
Genghis Khan (1965), there's a white guy as Genghis. Where's the bunch of .... scenes?
Battle of the Red Cliff, not sure but did his wife actually stop Tsao Tsao?
The Tudors, weren't some of them redheads?
Robinhood, I fail to see how a band of boys can change the tide of a battle.
Anything dubbed about China (Xinhai Revolution, 1911), English sounds like **** when you dub it over something that have nothing to do with it. For godsakes, you don't have to remake all the foreign films or dub it to English, read damn subtitles.
Going to watch Gladiator tonight and see what I can rant about it tomarrow. :S
This film was brilliant, although it probably killed the Turkish tourist industry for twenty years.
Co-incidentally it was on TV last night and I watched it for the first time in God knows how many years. It was brilliantly acted. As far as history is concerned, having never been inside a Turkish prison run by psychopathic, homosexual rapists, I cannot comment on its accuracy: what do you think? Is that how people carry on in Turkish jails?Brillant as a film or brillant as a historic thing?
Sure it's not that accurate but it's by no means the worst offender. Braveheart is easily less accurate.
A toss-up between this:
![]()
Co-incidentally it was on TV last night and I watched it for the first time in God knows how many years. It was brilliantly acted. As far as history is concerned, having never been inside a Turkish prison run by psychopathic, homosexual rapists, I cannot comment on its accuracy: what do you think? Is that how people carry on in Turkish jails?
Billy Hayes, the American prisoner, later complained about the changes made to his story (he didn't kill anyone, or bite their tongue out, no guard to tried to .... him, and he escaped from a different prison). Oliver Stone eventually apologised for his script and the portrayal of Turkish people.
As a work of cinematic fiction, it is a great film, though. Alan Parker and David Puttnam at the height of their alliance. (We Brits get a share of the blame for this one).
Always interests me how this standard only applies to the American film industryhollywood world war 2 films they seem to downplay every other countrys part in the war to piont its almost none existant
Definitely....
And all they needed for the first battle was a bridge!!![]()
Edit: On another forum I had a hard time convincing someone that Wallace did not actually capture the city of York.
I know it probably wasn't. But I don't think it was meant to be a good movie either.I dont think the last Legion was meant to be historically accurate, lol.